Derandomized Parallel Repetition via Structured PCPs

A PCP is a proof system for NP in which the proof can be checked by a probabilistic verifier. The verifier is only allowed to read a very small portion of the proof, and in return is allowed to err with some bounded probability. The probability that the verifier accepts a false proof is called the soundness error, and is an important parameter of a PCP system that one seeks to minimize. Constructing PCPs with sub-constant soundness error and, at the same time, a minimal number of queries into the proof (namely two) is especially important due to applications for inapproximability. In this work we construct such PCP verifiers, i.e., PCPs that make only two queries and have sub-constant soundness error. Our construction can be viewed as a combinatorial alternative to the "manifold vs. point" construction, which is the only construction in the literature for this parameter range. The "manifold vs. point" PCP is based on a low degree test, while our construction is based on a direct product test. We also extend our construction to yield a decodable PCP (dPCP) with the same parameters. By plugging in this dPCP into the scheme of Dinur and Harsha (FOCS 2009) one gets an alternative construction of the result of Moshkovitz and Raz (FOCS 2008), namely: a construction of two-query PCPs with small soundness error and small alphabet size. Our construction of a PCP is based on extending the derandomized direct product test of Impagliazzo, Kabanets and Wigderson (STOC 09) to a derandomized parallel repetition theorem. More accurately, our PCP construction is obtained in two steps. We first prove a derandomized parallel repetition theorem for specially structured PCPs. Then, we show that any PCP can be transformed into one that has the required structure, by embedding it on a de-Bruijn graph

Conditional Hardness for Approximate Coloring

We study the coloring problem: Given a graph G, decide whether $c(G) \leq q$ or $c(G) \ge Q$, where c(G) is the chromatic number of G. We derive conditional hardness for this problem for any constant $3 \le q < Q$. For $q\ge 4$, our result is based on Khot's 2-to-1 conjecture [Khot'02]. For $q=3$, we base our hardness result on a certain `fish shaped' variant of his conjecture. We also prove that the problem almost coloring is hard for any constant \eps>0, assuming Khot's Unique Games conjecture. This is the problem of deciding for a given graph, between the case where one can 3-color all but a \eps fraction of the vertices without monochromatic edges, and the case where the graph contains no independent set of relative size at least \eps. Our result is based on bounding various generalized noise-stability quantities using the invariance principle of Mossel et al [MOO'05]

Toward the KRW Composition Conjecture: Cubic Formula Lower Bounds via Communication Complexity

One of the major challenges of the research in circuit complexity is proving super-polynomial lower bounds for de-Morgan formulas. Karchmer, Raz, and Wigderson suggested to approach this problem by proving that formula complexity behaves "as expected" with respect to the composition of functions f * g. They showed that this conjecture, if proved, would imply super-polynomial formula lower bounds. The first step toward proving the KRW conjecture was made by Edmonds et al., who proved an analogue of the conjecture for the composition of "universal relations". In this work, we extend the argument of Edmonds et al. further to f * g where f is an arbitrary function and g is the parity function. While this special case of the KRW conjecture was already proved implicitly in Hastad\u27s work on random restrictions, our proof seems more likely to be generalizable to other cases of the conjecture. In particular, our proof uses an entirely different approach, based on communication complexity technique of Karchmer and Wigderson. In addition, our proof gives a new structural result, which roughly says that the naive way for computing f * g is the only optimal way. Along the way, we obtain a new proof of the state-of-the-art formula lower bound of n^{3-o(1)} due to Hastad

ETH-Hardness of Approximating 2-CSPs and Directed Steiner Network

We study the 2-ary constraint satisfaction problems (2-CSPs), which can be stated as follows: given a constraint graph $G=(V,E)$, an alphabet set $\Sigma$ and, for each $\{u, v\}\in E$, a constraint $C_{uv} \subseteq \Sigma\times\Sigma$, the goal is to find an assignment $\sigma: V \to \Sigma$ that satisfies as many constraints as possible, where a constraint $C_{uv}$ is satisfied if $(\sigma(u),\sigma(v))\in C_{uv}$. While the approximability of 2-CSPs is quite well understood when $|\Sigma|$ is constant, many problems are still open when $|\Sigma|$ becomes super constant. One such problem is whether it is hard to approximate 2-CSPs to within a polynomial factor of $|\Sigma| |V|$. Bellare et al. (1993) suggested that the answer to this question might be positive. Alas, despite efforts to resolve this conjecture, it remains open to this day. In this work, we separate $|V|$ and $|\Sigma|$ and ask a related but weaker question: is it hard to approximate 2-CSPs to within a polynomial factor of $|V|$ (while $|\Sigma|$ may be super-polynomial in $|V|$)? Assuming the exponential time hypothesis (ETH), we answer this question positively by showing that no polynomial time algorithm can approximate 2-CSPs to within a factor of $|V|^{1 - o(1)}$. Note that our ratio is almost linear, which is almost optimal as a trivial algorithm gives a $|V|$-approximation for 2-CSPs. Thanks to a known reduction, our result implies an ETH-hardness of approximating Directed Steiner Network with ratio $k^{1/4 - o(1)}$ where $k$ is the number of demand pairs. The ratio is roughly the square root of the best known ratio achieved by polynomial time algorithms (Chekuri et al., 2011; Feldman et al., 2012). Additionally, under Gap-ETH, our reduction for 2-CSPs not only rules out polynomial time algorithms, but also FPT algorithms parameterized by $|V|$. Similar statement applies for DSN parameterized by $k$.Comment: 36 pages. A preliminary version appeared in ITCS'1

Derandomized Graph Product Results using the Low Degree Long Code

In this paper, we address the question of whether the recent derandomization results obtained by the use of the low-degree long code can be extended to other product settings. We consider two settings: (1) the graph product results of Alon, Dinur, Friedgut and Sudakov [GAFA, 2004] and (2) the "majority is stablest" type of result obtained by Dinur, Mossel and Regev [SICOMP, 2009] and Dinur and Shinkar [In Proc. APPROX, 2010] while studying the hardness of approximate graph coloring. In our first result, we show that there exists a considerably smaller subgraph of $K_3^{\otimes R}$ which exhibits the following property (shown for $K_3^{\otimes R}$ by Alon et al.): independent sets close in size to the maximum independent set are well approximated by dictators. The "majority is stablest" type of result of Dinur et al. and Dinur and Shinkar shows that if there exist two sets of vertices $A$ and $B$ in $K_3^{\otimes R}$ with very few edges with one endpoint in $A$ and another in $B$, then it must be the case that the two sets $A$ and $B$ share a single influential coordinate. In our second result, we show that a similar "majority is stablest" statement holds good for a considerably smaller subgraph of $K_3^{\otimes R}$. Furthermore using this result, we give a more efficient reduction from Unique Games to the graph coloring problem, leading to improved hardness of approximation results for coloring

A New Multilayered PCP and the Hardness of Hypergraph Vertex Cover

Given a $k$-uniform hyper-graph, the E$k$-Vertex-Cover problem is to find the smallest subset of vertices that intersects every hyper-edge. We present a new multilayered PCP construction that extends the Raz verifier. This enables us to prove that E$k$-Vertex-Cover is NP-hard to approximate within factor $(k-1-\epsilon)$ for any $k \geq 3$ and any $\epsilon>0$. The result is essentially tight as this problem can be easily approximated within factor $k$. Our construction makes use of the biased Long-Code and is analyzed using combinatorial properties of $s$-wise $t$-intersecting families of subsets

Exponentially Small Soundness for the Direct Product Z-Test

Given a function f:[N]^k->[M]^k, the Z-test is a three query test for checking if a function f is a direct product, namely if there are functions g_1,...g_k:[N]->[M] such that f(x_1,...,x_k)=(g_1(x_1),...,g_k(x_k)) for every input x in [N]^k. This test was introduced by Impagliazzo et. al. (SICOMP 2012), who showed that if the test passes with probability epsilon > exp(-sqrt k) then f is Omega(epsilon) close to a direct product function in some precise sense. It remained an open question whether the soundness of this test can be pushed all the way down to exp(-k) (which would be optimal). This is our main result: we show that whenever f passes the Z test with probability epsilon > exp(-k), there must be a global reason for this: namely, f must be close to a product function on some Omega(epsilon) fraction of its domain. Towards proving our result we analyze the related (two-query) V-test, and prove a "restricted global structure" theorem for it. Such theorems were also proven in previous works on direct product testing in the small soundness regime. The most recent work, by Dinur and Steurer (CCC 2014), analyzed the V test in the exponentially small soundness regime. We strengthen their conclusion of that theorem by moving from an "in expectation" statement to a stronger "concentration of measure" type of statement, which we prove using hyper-contractivity. This stronger statement allows us to proceed to analyze the Z test. We analyze two variants of direct product tests. One for functions on ordered tuples, as above, and another for functions on sets of size k. The work of Impagliazzo et al. was actually focused only on functions of the latter type, i.e. on sets. We prove exponentially small soundness for the Z-test for both variants. Although the two appear very similar, the analysis for tuples is more tricky and requires some additional ideas

Every set in P is strongly testable under a suitable encoding

We show that every set in P is strongly testable under a suitable encoding. By "strongly testable" we mean having a (proximity oblivious) tester that makes a constant number of queries and rejects with probability that is proportional to the distance of the tested object from the property. By a "suitable encoding" we mean one that is polynomial-time computable and invertible. This result stands in contrast to the known fact that some sets in P are extremely hard to test, providing another demonstration of the crucial role of representation in the context of property testing. The testing result is proved by showing that any set in P has a strong canonical PCP, where canonical means that (for yes-instances) there exists a single proof that is accepted with probability 1 by the system, whereas all other potential proofs are rejected with probability proportional to their distance from this proof. In fact, we show that UP equals the class of sets having strong canonical PCPs (of logarithmic randomness), whereas the class of sets having strong canonical PCPs with polynomial proof length equals "unambiguous- MA". Actually, for the testing result, we use a PCP-of-Proximity version of the foregoing notion and an analogous positive result (i.e., strong canonical PCPPs of logarithmic randomness for any set in UP)